Understanding Git Merge vs Rebase
Ad
Merge vs Rebase
Both combine changes from one branch into another, but they create different histories. Understanding the difference avoids messy commit logs.
Git Merge
git checkout main
git merge feature
# Creates a merge commit, preserves full history
History keeps both branch lines and adds a merge commit.
Git Rebase
git checkout feature
git rebase main
# Replays your commits on top of main — linear history
History becomes a clean straight line, as if you branched from the latest main.
Visual Difference
| Merge | Rebase | |
|---|---|---|
| History | Branched, with merge commit | Linear |
| Safety | Safe | Rewrites commits |
| Best for | Shared branches | Local cleanup |
The Golden Rule
Never rebase commits that others have pulled — it rewrites history and breaks their copies.
FAQs
Which should I use?
Merge for shared/public branches; rebase to clean up your local commits before pushing. More in our Git guides.
What is interactive rebase?
git rebase -i lets you squash, reorder, or edit commits.
